From Prompts to Contracts: Harness Engineering for Auditable Enterprise LLM Agents
The paper introduces a harness-engineering architecture designed to make enterprise large language model agents more traceable, deterministic, and auditable.
The paper introduces a harness-engineering architecture designed to make enterprise large language model agents more traceable, deterministic, and auditable.
The paper introduces ContextSniper, a token-efficient code memory module designed to select precise evidence for repository-level program repair using language model agents.
This paper outlines a multi-agent framework that coordinates solver, critic, and aggregator foundation models to build more reliable cooperative reasoning systems.
Researchers proposed an SVD-based vision token pruning method to reduce the computational and memory overhead of processing long sequences in Vision-Language Models.
Researchers have introduced Concept-as-Tree, a synthetic data framework designed to improve the personalization capabilities of vision-language models by generating high-quality positive and negative samples.
The Large Sparse Reconstruction Model demonstrates how expanding transformer context windows can improve the recovery of fine-grained textures in feed-forward 3D reconstruction.
Researchers propose a hierarchical framework that utilizes a centralized large language model for strategic planning to coordinate specialized reinforcement learning policies in multi-agent environments.
Researchers have developed a content protection method that exploits context compression to prevent LLM-based web crawlers from scraping online information.
CriterAlign is a criterion-centric evaluation framework designed to improve pairwise code preference judging by aligning rationales across specific criteria.
VEGAS is a training-free evaluation metric that uses viewer gaze data to measure how well generated video captions align with human visual attention.
A new benchmark called PredicateLongBench has been introduced to systematically analyze the specific factors that make long-context tasks difficult for large language models.
This study investigates how pre-trained code models internally represent programming types by probing their hidden states across different programming languages.
This study introduces a self-validating framework to analyze and mitigate safety hazards and hallucinations in LLM-assisted safety engineering tools.
CausalDS is a new benchmark designed to evaluate the causal reasoning and data analysis capabilities of language model agents.
The paper introduces SearchGen-20K and SearchGen-Bench to address the world-knowledge limitations of visual generators by integrating search capabilities.
The paper proposes Narration-of-Thought, a system prompting technique that structures chain-of-thought reasoning to improve ethical decision-making and reduce bias in large language models.
A new framework maps large language model personality traits within weight space using low-rank adapters to measure and control model personas.
A new multi-agent workflow utilizing large language models has been developed to autonomously formalize complex theorems in theoretical physics.
Researchers have introduced ProjAgent, a repository-level code generation system that retrieves functions based on procedural logic rather than simple lexical or semantic similarity.
Researchers developed liteOdyssey, a lightweight framework that guides general-purpose language models through diagnostic reasoning for rare diseases without altering model weights.
Researchers have introduced a proactive memory agent designed to mitigate behavioral state decay in long-horizon tasks by actively retrieving relevant context.
The study presents a mechanistic taxonomy and diagnostic pipeline to track how failures like reward hacking and policy collapse emerge during reinforcement learning from human feedback.
Researchers have introduced a three-stage curriculum learning framework designed to efficiently distill chain-of-thought reasoning from large language models into smaller student models.
This paper demonstrates that evaluating zero-shot text-to-speech systems using automatic speech recognition verifiers is biased by the specific model family used for judgment.